26 août 2026
CAEP Meets with the Prime Minister’s Office
Share this statement:
On August 26, CAEP President Dr. Rob Primavesi and members of the Public Affairs Committee met with Julie Harb, Health Portfolio Advisor to the Prime Minister, to discuss CAEP’s priorities. One key focus was requiring provinces to report emergency department data through the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) to help create stronger, system-wide accountability for emergency care.
Below are the notes and talking points used for the meeting.
Endorsed by the National Emergency Nurses Association (NENA).
The Problem
Canadian emergency departments (EDs) are in a constant state of overcrowding, and system constraints prevent physicians and nurses from providing safe and timely care.
The Specifics
Canada’s EDs are facing unprecedented overcrowding¹, and ED physicians and nurses are unable to provide safe and timely care for patients with life threatening conditions².
Last year 1 in 13 patients left Canadian EDs without seeing a physician due to prolonged waits³, and patients who left experienced unacceptable rates of preventable disability and death⁴.
The main driver is hospital overcapacity, resulting in boarding admitted patients in EDs, and limiting space and personnel for arriving patients¹,³,⁵,⁶. These stays are prolonged by inadequate long-term care and community supports¹,³,⁷, while rising complexity means 1 in 10 ED visits now last over 14 hours³..
Few ED beds remain unoccupied, leaving patients waiting for hours, and sometimes days, in chairs and hallway stretchers, often receiving substandard care that can lead to tragic outcomes.⁸,⁹ The toll falls on staff as well as patients: a recent study found Canadian ED physicians are experiencing moral injury, prompting roughly 50% to reduce their shift load and 10% to leave the field.²
Amidst this ongoing crisis, there is no government accountability framework: no articulation of who is responsible for adverse outcomes and increasing lengths of stay, no defined deliverables, and no rewards or penalties tied to performance. Data are also incomplete. Eight provinces (PEI, Nova Scotia, Quebec, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, BC, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador) are not fully required to report ED metrics, including time to physician assessment, length of stay, and time to an inpatient bed, to the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS).¹⁰
Unconditional Canada Health Transfers (CHTs) and one-time top-ups have increased provincial health spending without improving access to emergency care.¹,³ As the federal government negotiates bilateral CHT agreements with the provinces, it has a direct lever to change this: make ED data reporting and accountability a condition of funding. As Canada’s population ages, with rising health complexity, climate-related disasters, and international conflict all adding pressure, all levels of government should urgently prioritize safe, timely emergency care.⁹
Short Term Target
Mandatory ED data reporting to NACRS as a condition of receipt of the CHT.
Long Term Target
Mandatory accountability frameworks for health care provision by provinces, including defined responsibility, deliverables and incentives for performance. These frameworks should be publicly accessible and give a clear articulation of time-bound ED and healthcare system improvements. CHT funding would be positively or negatively affected by performance.
References
1. Emergency Department Overcrowding in Canada: CADTH Health Technology Review Recommendation [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2023 Nov. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK599980/
2. de Wit K, Benepal J, Sivakumar A, Clayton N, Rang LCF, Bartels SA, Lim RK, Archambault PM, Chan TM, Gray S, Ritchie K, Gérin-Lajoie C, Mercuri M; Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers. Emergency physician burnout and attrition in Canada: a longitudinal study. CMAJ. 2026 Jul 27;198(27):E1055-E1064. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.251863
3. Emergency department waits reflect access to care across the system [report]. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information; updated 2026 June 25. Available: https://www.cihi.ca/en/emergency-department-wait-times-in-canada-insights-from-a-health-system-perspective/emergency-department-waits-reflect-access-to-care-across-the-system (accessed 2026 June 25).
4. McNaughton CD, Austin PC, Chu A, et al. Turbulence in the system: Higher rates of left-without-being-seen emergency department visits and associations with increased risks of adverse patient outcomes since 2020. JACEP Open. 2024; 5:e13299. https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.13299
5. Varner C. Without more acute care beds, hospitals are on their own to grapple with emergency department crises. CMAJ. 2023 Sep 5;195(34):E1157-E1158. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.231156
6. Kelen GD, Wolfe R, D’Onofrio G, et al. Emergency department crowding: the canary in the health care system. NEJM Catal. 2021. doi: 10.1056/CAT.21.0217.
7. Maisonnave M, Rajabi E, Taghavi M, VanBerkel P. Alternate Level of Care Patients in Canada: a Scoping Review. Can Geriatr J. 2024 Dec 1;27(4):519-530. doi: 10.5770/cgj.27.755.
8. Roussel M, Teissandier D, Yordanov Y, et al. Overnight Stay in the Emergency Department and Mortality in Older Patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(10):1378–1385. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.5961
9. Varner C. How to stop Canada's emergency physicians from leaving their profession. CMAJ. 2026 Jul 27;198(27):E1075-E1076. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.261030.
10. National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) metadata. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Health Information. Available: https://www.cihi.ca/en/national-ambulatory-care-reporting-system-nacrs-metadata (accessed 2026 Aug 7).
